Annie Proulx, the author of the original Brokeback Mountain story has said that she wishes she had never written the story.
Proulx, who wrote the 1997 short story, which was adapted in 2005 into the Oscar-winning film starring Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal, told interviewer Christopher Cox in the Paris Review that Jack and Ennis from Brokeback Mountain, “… got a life of their own. And unfortunately, they got a life of their own for too many other people too.”
When questioned by Cox as to what she meant, Proulx answered, “I wish I’d never written the story. It’s just been the cause of hassle and problems and irritation since the film came out. Before the film it was all right.”
Cox then asked whether people objected to the fact that gay characters were in the center of a story about Wyoming?
Proulx responded, “Oh, yeah. In Wyoming they won’t read it. A large section of the population is still outraged. But that’s not where the problem was. I’m used to that response from people here, who generally do not like the way I write. But the problem has come since the film. So many people have completely misunderstood the story. I think it’s important to leave spaces in a story for readers to fill in from their own experience, but unfortunately the audience that Brokeback reached most strongly have powerful fantasy lives. And one of the reasons we keep the gates locked here is that a lot of men have decided that the story should have had a happy ending. They can’t bear the way it ends—they just can’t stand it. So they rewrite the story, including all kinds of boyfriends and new lovers and so forth after Jack is killed. And it just drives me wild. They can’t understand that the story isn’t about Jack and Ennis. It’s about homophobia; it’s about a social situation; it’s about a place and a particular mindset and morality. They just don’t get it. I can’t tell you how many of these things have been sent to me as though they’re expecting me to say, Oh great, if only I’d had the sense to write it that way. And they all begin the same way—I’m not gay, but . . . The implication is that because they’re men they understand much better than I how these people would have behaved. And maybe they do. But that’s not the story I wrote. Those are not their characters. The characters belong to me by law.”
Proulx adds that she hasn’t had this problem with anything else she’s ever written, “People saw it as a story about two cowboys,” said Proulx.” It was never about two cowboys. You know you have to have characters to hang the story on but I guess they were too real. A lot of people have adopted them and put their names on their license plates. Sometimes the cart gets away from the horse—the characters outgrew the intent.”
I’m sorry, but if J.K. Rowling can handle fanfiction featuring romances like Dobby/Hagrid and Weasley incest (to name just two of the staggering amount of truly perverse pairings found online), then Annie Proulx can handle some fans trying to extend Ennis’s story to include a little more love. Just be grateful the story’s touched so many people–I promise most people actually get the point of the story; it’s just the overzealous ones are disproportionately more likely to write crazy fan mail.